Tag Archives: China

3 military personnels attacked on Guam

Three active duty military personnel were brought to Naval Hospital Guam Saturday night after a group of men attacked them in Tumon, according to Guam police.

It was the second time in a week service members reportedly have been attacked in Tumon.

The Guam Police Department is asking the public to come forward if they have any information about the incident.

GPD spokesman Officer A.J. Balajadia said the service members were attacked by a group of about 10 men, described by police as local.

The attack occurred around 9 p.m. Saturday night near the Slingshot in Tumon, Balajadia said in a press release. Police will review security camera footage to determine what took place.

On Nov. 16, six sailors were sent to Naval Hospital Guam after a large group attacked them with bats, clubs and pipes near Acanta Mall in Tumon, according to a press release from Joint Region Marianas.

“(Police Chief Fred Bordallo) is taking these types of incidents against our military personnel seriously and will work with our military counterparts in charging any individual involved in these assaults,” Balajadia said in his release.

Guam in reach of Chinese missiles

WASHINGTON — Advancements in Chinese military capabilities mean Guam has lost its status as a safe haven for American forces in the Western Pacific, a top war strategist says.

“We are no longer out of reach,” Thomas Mahnken, professor at the U.S. Naval War College in Rhode Island, said in an interview with the Gannett Washington Bureau.

That’s especially the case, he said, in regard to Chinese ballistic missiles that could rain down on U.S. airfields and other facilities on the island.

“They have put a lot of resources into missile programs,” Mahnken said.

While the United States has been tied down for the past decade in Afghanistan and the Middle East, he said, the Chinese have been making rapid progress on a range of military technologies.

“They have exploited that,” Mahnken said.

Besides conventionally armed ballistic missiles, developments in Chinese armaments include sea-launched missiles, both nuclear and conventionally armed; nuclear and diesel submarines; cruise missiles; intercontinental ballistic weapons; better combat aircraft and bombers; and anti-satellite weapons. And cyberwarfare, he said, has not been neglected.

Mahnken said the U.S. military retains clear superiority, but “in some cases our advantage is slipping.” Earlier this month, Mahnken delivered similar warnings to the House Armed Services Committee and U.S. Delegate Madeleine Bordallo.

“This is a matter of some urgency since China is, for the first time, close to achieving a military capability to deny U.S. and allied forces access to much of the Western Pacific rim,” he told the committee.

“The assumption that U.S. bases in Guam, Japan and elsewhere will be secure from attack is in question. The (Chinese military) is fielding ballistic and cruise missile systems and a number of other capabilities designed to destroy most key facilities,” Mahnken also testified.

Despite Mahnken’s testimony, Bordallo said in a statement Wednesday: “There is no specific threat from China against U.S. interests in Guam. The reposturing of U.S. military forces in the Pacific seeks to realign our forces to better respond to a variety of threats or humanitarian crises in the region. Moreover, our military maintains a variety of assets that can counter a wide range of weapons that any country may possess, and this was a point made by U.S. Pacific Command in testimony before our committee.”

She added: “Although I share the concerns that have been voiced regarding China’s level of investment in its military, greater transparency by the Chinese government will go a long way in addressing these concerns. I am also confident that the U.S.-China relationship will continue to improve through greater interaction between our military officials as well as greater economic opportunities between our countries.”

Since World War II, the United States has relied on a system of forward bases to deter adversaries and reassure allies, Mahnken said.

In that light, Guam has frequently been called “the tip of the spear.”

Now in doubt, he told lawmakers, is the notion that on Guam or anywhere else in the Western Pacific, the U.S. will “enjoy an operational sanctuary in space.”

Assumptions that U.S. naval vessels “can operate with impunity in all parts of the Western Pacific is questionable” as well, he told the committee.

A central question is whether the Chinese would regard Guam as a “red line” that they dare not cross because of the threat of U.S. retaliation. Related to that is whether Middle America cares enough about Guam to support going to war to defend it, Mahnken said in the interview.

A conflict over Taiwan, Mahken said, would likely bring Guam into play for both sides.

The Chinese, he testified, are working night and day to develop “programs to degrade or destroy the U.S. command, control and communications abilities, as well as American intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance and the navigational systems that are critical for U.S. military operations.”

American forces would hardly be defenseless, he said, but the Chinese are clearly working to develop military power that compliments their status as an economic superpower.

In sum, he told lawmakers, “Chinese military modernization threatens to reshape the balance of power in Asia.”

In response to China’s enhancement of its forces, Mahnken testified, the United States should bolster its intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance networks in the Pacific; harden and diversify its Pacific bases, especially Guam; and bolster the submarine forces of allies and develop better ways to better link with them.

Source:  http://www.guampdn.com/article/20110403/NEWS01/104030321/Guam-reach-Chinese-missiles?odyssey=tab|topnews|text|Frontpage


China challenges US predominance in Asia-Pacific

WASHINGTON – When China launched threatening war games off Taiwan 15 years ago on the eve of an election on the self-governing island, the U.S. deployed two aircraft carriers, and China quickly backed down.

Things don’t seem so one-sided any more.

China’s military has been on a spending spree at a time that the debt-ridden U.S. government is looking to cut defense costs. On Friday, China announced a 12.7 percent hike for this year, the latest in a string of double-digit increases.

That trend has triggered worries in Congress and among security analysts about whether the United States can maintain its decades-long military predominance in the economically crucial Asia-Pacific.

While the U.S. military has been drained by 10 years of costly conflicts in Afghanistan and Iraq, China has developed air, naval and missile capabilities that could undercut U.S. superiority in China’s backyard.

China is still decades away from building a military as strong as the United States. It has not fought a major conflict since a border war with Vietnam in 1979 and is not a Soviet-style rival threatening American soil.

But the shift raises questions about whether the U.S. can meet its commitment to maintain a strong presence in the Asia-Pacific for decades — a matter not just of global prestige but also seen as critical for safeguarding shipping lanes vital for world trade and protecting allies.

China already has an innate geographical advantage in any conflict in the west Pacific. One expert posits that with its military buildup, China could conquer Taiwan by the end of the decade even if the U.S. military intervenes.

China regards Taiwan as part of its territory. Relations between the two, long seen as a potential flash point, have warmed in the past two years. But China’s assertion of territorial claims in the South China Sea, which it has declared as a “core interest” — essentially something it could go to war over — has spooked its neighbors and fortified their support for a strong U.S. presence in the region. Even former enemy Vietnam is forging military ties with the U.S.

Last week, the Philippines deployed two warplanes after a ship searching for oil complained it was harassed by two Chinese patrol boats in the South China Sea. Japan scrambled F-15 fighter jets after Chinese surveillance and anti-submarine aircraft flew near disputed islands in the East China Sea.

“As China’s military has gotten more capable and China has behaved more aggressively, a number of countries are looking at the U.S. as a hedge to make sure they can maintain independence, security and stability,” said Abraham Denmark, director of the Asia-Pacific Security Program at the Center for a New American Security.

But those allies question whether the U.S. can retain its freedom to operate in the region, and whether its economy — highly indebted to China and struggling to recover from a recession — can sustain its high level of military spending, said Bonnie Glaser, a China expert at the Center of Strategic and International Studies think tank.

The U.S. Pacific Command has 325,000 personnel, five aircraft carrier strike groups, 180 ships and nearly 2,000 aircraft. Tens of thousands of forces stay on China’s doorstep at long-established bases in South Korea and Japan.

China’s defense spending is still dwarfed by the United States. Even if China really invests twice as much in its military as its official $91.5 billion budget, which some analysts believe, that is still only about a quarter of U.S. spending. It has no aircraft carriers and lags the U.S. in defense technology. Some of its most vaunted recent military advances will take years to reach operation.

For example, China test flew its stealth fighter in January, months earlier than U.S. intelligence expected, but U.S. Defense Secretary Robert Gates says China will still only have a couple of hundred of these “fifth-generation” jets by 2025, when the United States should have 1,500.

But China’s growing array of aircraft, naval and submarine vessels, ballistic and cruise missiles, anti-satellite and cyber war capabilities already enable it to project power beyond its shores. It plans new submarines, larger naval destroyers and transport aircraft that could expand that reach further.

Roger Cliff, a respected defense researcher who recently testified before a congressional hearing on China, says many of the missiles and strike aircraft have a range of about 900 miles, which put them within attacking distance of virtually all U.S. air and naval bases in the region. They include the DF-21D missile which is designed to target aircraft carriers. It employs technology that no other U.S. rival has mastered. It does not appear to have been tested yet against a maneuvering target at sea.

Cliff said if trends continue, China should have sufficient missiles and precision bombs by the end of the decade to render inoperable for a week or more all airfields on Taiwan and U.S. air bases in Okinawa, Japan, and possibly others farther away. He said there are between 40 and 50 Chinese air bases within 500 miles of Taiwan, each generally hosting a squadron of 24 aircraft, which could overwhelm superior U.S. aircraft through sheer numbers. If China acquired amphibious landing vehicles, he forecast it could conquer Taiwan.

If U.S. military planners are worried about that possibility, they aren’t showing it. They say plans to cap defense spending within five years won’t derail modernization plans. Pacific Command chief Adm. Robert Willard said last month that while the U.S. carefully watches China’s growing military capabilities — and urges greater openness from China about them — the United States does not need to change its strategy.

China maintains it does not have offensive intentions, and analysts say that military action in the region would hurt its export-driven economy which could threaten what its government prizes above all else — domestic stability. The U.S. military presence may also benefit China as it restrains neighbors like South Korea and Japan from seeking nuclear weapons.

As U.S. and Chinese forces increasingly rub up against each other in the west Pacific, the U.S. says it wants to promote military ties with China to prevent a chance skirmish and for China to develop as a “responsible major power.” To date, China has been reluctant to engage meaningfully after the recent restoration of military ties that were cut over U.S. arms sales to Taiwan.

“This is not the Cold War with two rival camps facing each other,” said Michael Schiffer, U.S. deputy assistant secretary of defense for East Asia. “We are seeking a military-military relationship that is broad and deep enough to manage our differences while expanding on areas of common interest.”

Source:  http://news.yahoo.com/nphotos/FILE—July-26-2010-file-photo-rleased-China-Xinhua/photo//110307/481/urn_publicid_ap_org0d359787dc5e4c7e99b3c3529166f477//s:/ap/20110307/ap_on_re_us/us_us_china_military_rivalry